he latest and hottest methodology talked about to help a company innovate. GE calls it CENCOR (calibrate, explore, create, organize and realize). The Mayo Clinic calls it SPARC (see, plan, act, refine, communicate). Andrew’s new company calls it GIP (Gather, Ideate, Prototype). Its most obvious and direct power is in the creation of new products and services. Design thinking allows an organization to differentiate its products and services in an avenue other than pricing.Filed under: Designers, FMCG innovation, Food trends & info, Future of Work, Innovation, Innovation shops, Innovative stimulus, Looking for insights, Nice Design, Research Methods, Work Futures, new product | Tags: Andrew Tan, CENCOR, Design Thinking, GE, IDEO, Innovation, new product, prototyping, The Mayo Clinic, what if, whatif, whatif innovation
Here’s another little ditty from Andrew Tan’s blog WhatIf which covers innovation & design from an Asian perspective. And no, he’s not part of the global outfit Whatif Innovation, he runs his own innovation company and this is his personal blog.
he latest and hottest methodology talked about to help a company innovate. GE calls it CENCOR (calibrate, explore, create, organize and realize). The Mayo Clinic calls it SPARC (see, plan, act, refine, communicate). Andrew’s new company calls it GIP (Gather, Ideate, Prototype). Its most obvious and direct power is in the creation of new products and services. Design thinking allows an organization to differentiate its products and services in an avenue other than pricing.Filed under: Gaming, Geek stuff, Get another life, Innovative gaming, Looking for insights, Machinima, Second Life, virtual worlds | Tags: Clive Thompson, Collision Detection, CollisionDetection, gamers, Gaming, Halo, MIND Labs, MMORPG
In his blog CollisionDetection, Clive Thompson who writes for Wired and the NY Times has posted a great piece about about the pleasure and release MMORPG [massive multiplayer online role playing gamers] feel when they get killed [as opposed to when they kill others]. His findings are based on a study by Niklas Ravaja at MIND Labs, who wired up a bunch of gamers with biosensors and found that they gave off strong pleasure signals whenever they died in the game Super Monkey Ball.
The rest of his post is here and if you haven’t checked out his blog, it’s worth a look in:
Filed under: Advertising, Gen Research, Innovative stimulus, Lifestyle trends, Looking for insights, Research Methods, Trendy Trend sites | Tags: coolhunting, Dcode, Henley Centre, Piers Fawkes, PSFK, The problem with trends, trendhunting, trends, Trendspotters, trendspotting
Piers has called the Emperor’s bluff and now he’s naked . . . . Here’s a sneak but check it out for yourself, it’s a good post.
There’s something wrong in the trends business. It’s broken. It’s broken by lack of imagination, lack of collaboration and secrecy. Below we’ve listed some major areas that need fixing, not for our competitive sake, but for an industry to evolve and become useful enough to inspire its clients to make things better.
Trends services have an unhealthy reliance on control, restriction of information and perception. Trends companies put up gates that guard this mystical information that somehow only they could gather. This presentation from Henley Center’s d_Code is an example of how the trends industry attempts to scare companies into thinking how little they know. There’s no explanation of why d_code knows better, just that they somehow know a lot more than you do (and they’ve got the graphic designer to prove it). AgencySpy gave this great reaction to the presentation in 2007:
“No ideas. No dissection of new cultural movements to help you on your way. No outlay of creatives, organizations, thinkers that are shaking up the underground to shape the future. Nada. Every one of their clients should feel like they just got punk’d.”
I’ve been reading up on the future of travel for a project I’m working on and came across this question on one of the travel blogs I ‘ve been following. It’s a simple question but a goodie. I’m tempted to say, . . “what a good question to open an innovation session with to talk about how we get into particular rivers of thinking and often don’t realise that we stick to sameness unless we force ourselves to think & act differently . . yada yada” but the truth is, it’s a good question to ask yourself, not because you want to be more innovative or creative, not because you even want to be more interesting, just because sometimes we have to remind ourselves to dive head first into life no matter how cold the water may be or how much might spray up our nose. So . . .
When was the last time you did something for the first time?
Well . . .?







