he latest and hottest methodology talked about to help a company innovate. GE calls it CENCOR (calibrate, explore, create, organize and realize). The Mayo Clinic calls it SPARC (see, plan, act, refine, communicate). Andrew’s new company calls it GIP (Gather, Ideate, Prototype). Its most obvious and direct power is in the creation of new products and services. Design thinking allows an organization to differentiate its products and services in an avenue other than pricing.Filed under: Emergent media, Future of Work, Gen Research, Research Methods | Tags: Alltop, Guy Kawasaki, Kathryn Henkens, Nononina, Will Mayall
If you’re an infomaniac and you haven’t seen Alltop then check it out now.
Started by “two guys and a gal” in a garage—or more accurately, one guy in home office (Will Mayall), one gal on a kitchen table (Kathryn Henkens), and one Guy in United 2B (Guy Kawasaki).
They describe it like this:
We help you explore your passions by collecting stories from “all the top” sites on the web. We’ve grouped these collections — “aggregations” — into individual Alltop sites based on topics such as environment, photography, science, Muslim, celebrity gossip, military, fashion, gaming, sports, politics, automobiles, and Macintosh. At each Alltop site, we display the headlines of the latest stories from dozens of sites and blogs.
You can think of an Alltop site as a “digital magazine rack” of the Internet. To be clear, Alltop sites are starting points—they are not destinations per se. The bottom line is that we are trying to enhance your online reading by both displaying stories from the sites that you’re already visiting and helping you discover sites that you didn’t know existed. In other words, our goal is the “cessation of Internet stagnation” by providing “aggregation without aggravation.”
Filed under: Designers, FMCG innovation, Food trends & info, Future of Work, Innovation, Innovation shops, Innovative stimulus, Looking for insights, Nice Design, Research Methods, Work Futures, new product | Tags: Andrew Tan, CENCOR, Design Thinking, GE, IDEO, Innovation, new product, prototyping, The Mayo Clinic, what if, whatif, whatif innovation
Here’s another little ditty from Andrew Tan’s blog WhatIf which covers innovation & design from an Asian perspective. And no, he’s not part of the global outfit Whatif Innovation, he runs his own innovation company and this is his personal blog.
he latest and hottest methodology talked about to help a company innovate. GE calls it CENCOR (calibrate, explore, create, organize and realize). The Mayo Clinic calls it SPARC (see, plan, act, refine, communicate). Andrew’s new company calls it GIP (Gather, Ideate, Prototype). Its most obvious and direct power is in the creation of new products and services. Design thinking allows an organization to differentiate its products and services in an avenue other than pricing.Filed under: Advertising, Gen Research, Innovative stimulus, Lifestyle trends, Looking for insights, Research Methods, Trendy Trend sites | Tags: coolhunting, Dcode, Henley Centre, Piers Fawkes, PSFK, The problem with trends, trendhunting, trends, Trendspotters, trendspotting
Piers has called the Emperor’s bluff and now he’s naked . . . . Here’s a sneak but check it out for yourself, it’s a good post.
There’s something wrong in the trends business. It’s broken. It’s broken by lack of imagination, lack of collaboration and secrecy. Below we’ve listed some major areas that need fixing, not for our competitive sake, but for an industry to evolve and become useful enough to inspire its clients to make things better.
Trends services have an unhealthy reliance on control, restriction of information and perception. Trends companies put up gates that guard this mystical information that somehow only they could gather. This presentation from Henley Center’s d_Code is an example of how the trends industry attempts to scare companies into thinking how little they know. There’s no explanation of why d_code knows better, just that they somehow know a lot more than you do (and they’ve got the graphic designer to prove it). AgencySpy gave this great reaction to the presentation in 2007:
“No ideas. No dissection of new cultural movements to help you on your way. No outlay of creatives, organizations, thinkers that are shaking up the underground to shape the future. Nada. Every one of their clients should feel like they just got punk’d.”
Filed under: Borrow this, Geek stuff, Gen Research, Looking for insights, Research Methods, Thinking, creativity, steal or borrow info
Just saw this posted this morning & had to share it. It’s a periodic table of all the visualisation methods you’ll ever need as a strategic planner or innovation type person. (Well, maybe almost).
Check it out here
Filed under: Future of Work, Innovation, Innovative stimulus, Research Methods, Work Futures, creativity | Tags: Innovation, innovation research, innovative research, inspiring innovation, new research methods, provocative research, Research Methods, stimulating innovation
So what it is?
It’s a rich, colourful and most importantly, an alternative POV to stimulate innovation. It’s not 100% backed up by six
ty tons of data, it’s a broad brushstroke picture created by a bunch of interesting and springy data sources that suggests change is afoot!
It’s not trend research, it’s not qualitative research, it’s extreme and alternative points of view that provoke change. This is not foundational research, it’s about connecting the dots. It’s inspiration for innovation.
Much of what companies do is incremental innovation. Small projects addressing an immediate need for a new telco bundle offer or a new snack bar. Provocation research takes us beyond incremental innovation. It looks to the future, forecasting trends (industry, social or macro where appropriate) to provide a richer context for the work of now.
It’s a more extreme view (disruptive) but it’s about taking the principles of the future of the category and of the consumer landscape, how they might change and be disrupted, and applying those principles to projects today. (more…)
Filed under: Innovation, Innovation shops, Research Methods, Work Futures | Tags: innovation risk, return on investment, risk of inaction, risk of not innovating, ROI
Todd Earwood at the Blog World Expo and posted the top 10 quotes heard on day one. One we love is . .
“When you say ROI, do you mean return on investment or risk of inaction.” – Paul Gillin, Paul Gillin Communications
Kindly provided by Tomorrow’s Trends







